Well, Pat Symonds has another opinion on crash.net :

Symonds: We still would have finished second. Pat Symonds has insisted that Fernando Alonso would still have finished in second place had he kept to the planned strategy for his second stop. With Michael Schumacher struggling greatly with tyre degredation during the second stint of the race, allowing Alonso to home in on the seven-time world champion in just ten laps, it was thought that the Spaniard would merely vault him when he came in for his second stop, particularly as he was expected to run several laps longer. However, this was not the case according to Symonds, who claimed that Alonso had been short fuelled at his first pit stop to get ahead of Jenson Button and Felipe Massa, meaning he had a maximum of just one more lap than Schumacher, a lap that was not thought to have been enough to get him ahead. "Things became very surprising (in the middle stint). Michael's tyre degradation was suddenly dreadful – and it very soon became clear that we were significantly quicker than him, and running much faster. It took Fernando less than ten laps to close the gap and start pressuring him."

Now who is he trying to fool ? Try to make Flavio eat that - I won't eat it ! I am quite sure we all know pretty well that moving Alonso's second stop was a bad, bad mistake

From eurosport.com :

Rivals play down Ferrari win Just as one swallow does not make a summer, one win does not make a championship, and this was precisely the reaction from Renault, McLaren and Honda following Ferrari's victory at last weekend's San Marino Grand Prix - an event that often brings out the best of the Scuderia. Imola is a sacred circuit for Ferrari as it is here that the Scuderia has enjoyed much success, often against the odds, and this year was now different as star driver Michael Schumacher and strategist Ross Brawn coupled together to extract another impressive victory.